Quick Links
Public Libraries in the US
Analysis of 2001 data
Rank Order Tables
Analyzing Trends
Trends Results
Tables

Paid FTE Librarians per 25,000 population, 1991-2002


Abstract

All groups but the smallest gained librarians. Not that this use of "librarian" is not the same as ALA -MLS librarians which are dealt with separately. The decline seen here in the number of librarians at the smallest libraries is an artifact of the data which has a number of anomalous and unbelievable values. These are discussed below under "Anomalous Values." This analysis suggests that this kind of ratio is of less value for smaller libraries.

There is a Rank Order Table for this variable in 2002 and a summary table of the ranks by state from 1992-2002.


A line plot of the mean number of interlibrary loans received per 1,000 population at the five groups by year

Paid FTE Librarians per 25,000 population, by Group
  First Quartile Second Quartile Third Quartile Fourth Quartile 95%
1990 . . . . .
1991 18.09 7.92 5.36 3.85 2.99
1992 17.92 8.07 5.49 3.96 3.08
1993 18.17 7.98 5.65 4.08 3.21
1994 18.46 7.78 5.44 3.95 3.17
1995 18.41 7.79 5.43 3.94 3.18
1996 14.73 7.73 5.44 3.98 3.22
1997 15.11 8.09 5.62 4.07 3.23
1998 15.19 8.10 5.66 4.14 3.26
1999 15.30 8.17 5.78 4.24 3.27
2000 15.59 8.39 5.88 4.30 3.31
2001 16.24 8.79 5.99 4.30 3.30
2002 16.39 9.21 6.13 4.29 3.29
# increase
(decrease),
1991-2002
(1.70) 1.29 0.77 0.44 0.30
% increase
(decrease),
1991-2002
(9.4) 16.3 14.4 11.4 10.0

Note: The value for the Town of Ulster Public Library, Kinston, New York (newkey = NY0259) for POPU_UND for 1992 was 8,478, 1993 was 1, and 1994 was 11,507. In this analysis, the value for 1993 was changed to 9,993, the mean of the 1992 and 1994 figures.

Anomalous Values

See a similar discussion at Staff Expenditures per capita

The dip seen between 1995 and 1996 in the First Quartile libraries is reflected in a similar dip in the data for Total Staff. Is what the analysis discloses real, is it an artifact in the data, or of the calculations themselves?

We can't answer the question exactly because there are peculiar values in the series that may or may not be correct but the calculation of the ratio of librarians per unduplicated population of 25,000 has a characteristic that the very smallest libraries can have minor changes in staff or population served and have dramatic drops in the ratio. The 2002 Rank Order Table for this variable has a high of 8.49, a low of 1.95 and a mean of 4.05. However, look at this series for Brownell Public Library, Brownwell, Kansas (newkey = KS0280):

Paid FTE Librarians per 25,000 population, Brownell, Kansas
  Librarians Unduplicated Population
Served
Ratio per 25,000
1991 1.00 44 568.18
1992 1.00 44 568.18
1993 1.00 44 568.18
1994 1.00 41 609.76
1995 1.00 41 609.76
1996 0.25 39 160.26
1997 0.25 39 160.26
1998 0.25 39 160.26
1999 0.25 39 160.26
2003 0.25 39 160.26

There are about 2,000 libraries reporting in 1995 and 1996 and this ratio, as we can see, is very prone to disruption by the smallest values. Be that as it may, we have a drop in this ratio from one library in 1996 of almost 450, in other words, this one library causes the average of all of the First Quartile libraries to drop over 4 by itself--or more than the average value for 2002. This not by any means the only example in this group of libraries and it appears that a number of examples come from Kansas. That is, Kansas has a number of libraries serving a small populations with a small and changing number of paid librarians. There are also situations where the numbers seem incorrect. For instance, Stockton, Kansas Public Library (newkey=KS0037) in 2001 is reported to have had 1,555 population served and 32.72 librarians for a ratio of 526.05.

Valid XHTML 1.0!


October 20, 2004
Analysis of 2001 data
Analyzing Trends
Trends Results
Tables
Public Libraries in the United States
Back to NCES index
NCLIS 30th Anniversary logo Return to NCLIS Homepage